Numerous times over the past few weeks I had the opportunity to share with clients, investors and friends alike my negative opinion about Russia's future economic outlook.
I went back to substantiate some of my qualitative comments with data gathered from the recent World Economic Forum report.
The data from the report is not encouraging, following is a summary that I have provided in an earlier post:
Russia: 63th position, same as last year. After the significant slide of the previous year, Russia maintains its position. While infrastructure, health, education and technology improves significantly other components of the index suffer. The major area of concern highlighted in the report are market competitiveness and efficiency of the goods markets. Competition is hindered by inefficient anti monopoly laws and restrictions on trade and foreign ownership. One of the main issue highlighted further in the report remains the weak institutions that translate in weak property rights (126th rank) and weak corporate governance standards (119th rank).
In spite of the large amount of natural resources available for development the country doesn't seem to be able to attract large amount of foreign capital due to poor market efficiency and regulatory frameworks able to give proper guarantees to foreign investors.
Further to the contingent stagnant situation I believe there are some more fundamental weaknesses of the system that is worth outlining:
- very negative demographic trends;
- limited communication skills in the international arena as most of the business people tend not to be able to speak basic English.
- weak and non competitive SME sector
The first is the most worrisome of the trends. It has been recognized by the local government as a serious problem and some measures have been taken to stimulate the natality rate.
Low birth rates and abnormally high death rates caused Russia's population to decline at a 0.5% annual rate, or about 750,000 to 800,000 people per year from the mid 90s to the mid 00s.
The population peaked in 1991 with 148,689,000 and it is now at 141,927,000 as of January 1, 2010.
The language aspect is more difficult to quantify in its impact but in my opinion remains an important one. While the Indian subcontinent for example presents clear difficulties in regulatory frameworks and infrastructure among others remains a lot more dynamic and integrated with the global economy due to the pervasive use of the English language among the average business person.
On the other hand Russia remains insulated as most of the business people, even of young age, are barely able to speak basic business English.
Russians have developed their own set of social network website separate from the rest of the world: Vkontakte (www.vkontakte.ru) and they are trying to develop their own set of domain names in cyrillic: Russian domain names.
In a world where being connected and communication is the underlying basis for all business it is hard to imagine how big is the cost of this type of "isolation".
The SME sector is undersized for this nation as the entrepreneurial class has only a very brief history. During the entire Soviet Union time there was a systematic dismantling of the entrepreneurial spirit and only after the break up and the savage deregulation following SMEs have found a reason to exist.
In both emerging markets and developed countries SMEs often tend to be the most resilient during an economic downturn as well as a consistent source of innovation. Without such developed strata of companies combined with some of the difficulties outlined above the Russia economy appears lacking a necessary component to long term prosperity. Please note that to support the claim above according to the latest World Bank's survey (Doing Business, 2009) Russia ranks 120 out of 181 economies in 'ease of doing business'.
Overall, my position remains that given the existing economic issues and moreover due to the long term demographic trends currently in place Russia no longer belongs to the emerging market economies in spite of the large natural resources available on the territory.
Too many changes are to be applied at the same time to reverse the situation. It would be at least necessary to create a more favorable set of predictable rules to favor and regulate foreign investment in the country such to develop and modernize further the natural resources industries.
Swift and deep additional efforts are to be made to integrate additional foreign workers in the country to be able to reverse some of the underlying demographic trends and more importantly collect the related taxes.
As many friends and clients come from this beautiful country I hope to assist to a swift reversal of such trends.
Thank you, Luca, for sharing your opinion with us. Please allow me to provide my reflections on the subject as it lies close to my senses of a proud Russia’s representative.
ReplyDeleteI support the main point of an article, stating that Russia shouldn’t belong to the emerging markets group. The initial data, legislation and business environment research corresponds to many business analyses done within Russia, where some of the economists are having totally negative vision the subject.
However, I would like to have a closer look at some of the parameters that define country as an “emerging market” and give some comparative observations.
First of all, one of the important factors of success of Brasil, China and India is a cheap labour cost supported by a growing population. Russia is different from them even if we compare the level of average literacy as well as educational standards in Russia, which remain high. This makes cost of life and cost of labour reasonably higher and eliminates it from a competitive advantage list. There’s substantial amount of workers coming from China to find employment in country’s regions for a reason of higher income, let’s hope it might partially resolve the “working hands” deficit in the future.
Secondly, placing any production in the country of Nothern hemisphere generally is more expensive than in the South, so even this factor solely can reduce the stream of foreign investments if there’s a choice of locations, as here nothing can be done here to climb on the list of the “ease to do business list”.
I disagree on a language argument – in Brasil you would find the use of English language in even smaller proportion, while in Russia considerable percentage of young professionals are able to use English as a communication and business tool.
As a conclusion I have to add that Russia has always been a unique country – not completely West, not completely East, not informational developed society, not a recently emerged third world country either, so I believe there’s no harm in excluding Russia from BRIC. We have talented and keen-witted people, which managed to retain the entrepreneurial spirit despite 70 years of suppression, so I would try to stay and remain positive about our country’s future.